<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://www.softec.org/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>It's Just Business - All Comments</title><link>http://www.softec.org/blogs/its_just_business/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2008.5 SP2 (Build: 40407.4157)</generator><item><title>re: Tax Strategy Patents</title><link>http://www.softec.org/blogs/its_just_business/archive/2011/04/01/tax-strategy-patents.aspx#11920</link><pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 19:14:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">237d73a1-6c37-4813-9188-cf6639c9be28:11920</guid><dc:creator>PHILIP STEINER</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;This is one perspective. However, the question becomes where do you draw the line on what constitutes &amp;quot;tax strategy patents?&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For example, Intuit produces the well known software Turbotax and Quickbooks. To protect their investment, Intuit has hundreds of patents and patent applications in this field of endeavor. Both of these products include &amp;quot;what if&amp;quot; options to determine tax consequences. As is apparent, it becomes a slippery slope when attempting to define what constitutes patentable subject matter and what should not be included.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In terms of the pending legislation, there are significant changes proposed that could be detrimental to individual inventors and small businesses by changing first to invent to a type of first to file system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My personal opinion is that the current bill should be scrapped in favor of a simpler bill which actually addresses known problems with the US patent system. As is apparent, I am not a supporter of this legislation as it currently exists. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.softec.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11920" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Tax Strategy Patents</title><link>http://www.softec.org/blogs/its_just_business/archive/2011/04/01/tax-strategy-patents.aspx#11846</link><pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:43:27 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">237d73a1-6c37-4813-9188-cf6639c9be28:11846</guid><dc:creator>Thomas Lebens</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;We shall see if the House and Senate can agree on something. It has not happened a lot lately. Like most legislation, there is a lot of &amp;quot;stuff&amp;quot; in this bill, in addition to the words addressing patents on tax strategy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.softec.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11846" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SUBSTANTIATING YOUR DEDUCTIONS </title><link>http://www.softec.org/blogs/its_just_business/archive/2011/02/03/substantiating-your-deductions.aspx#11814</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 18:18:53 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">237d73a1-6c37-4813-9188-cf6639c9be28:11814</guid><dc:creator>Rosa Couto</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you for posting this article. &amp;nbsp;It&amp;#39;s very useful and important information just in time for tax season. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.softec.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11814" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: SUBSTANTIATING YOUR DEDUCTIONS </title><link>http://www.softec.org/blogs/its_just_business/archive/2011/02/03/substantiating-your-deductions.aspx#11813</link><pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 17:56:05 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">237d73a1-6c37-4813-9188-cf6639c9be28:11813</guid><dc:creator>Justin Couto</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent! &amp;nbsp;This is the kind of information everyone can use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.softec.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11813" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New Tax Law Summary</title><link>http://www.softec.org/blogs/its_just_business/archive/2010/12/31/new-tax-law-summary.aspx#11806</link><pubDate>Tue, 11 Jan 2011 05:23:24 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">237d73a1-6c37-4813-9188-cf6639c9be28:11806</guid><dc:creator>Justin Couto</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Excellent Post! &amp;nbsp;This is a great summary of what we should expect.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.softec.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11806" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: New Tax Law Summary</title><link>http://www.softec.org/blogs/its_just_business/archive/2010/12/31/new-tax-law-summary.aspx#11801</link><pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:11:25 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">237d73a1-6c37-4813-9188-cf6639c9be28:11801</guid><dc:creator>Thomas Lebens</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks Eric for this!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div style="clear:both;"&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.softec.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=11801" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>
